google-site-verification: google3d9aaac5c109b05a.html
top of page
Search

Zinc Picolinate vs Zinc Bisglycinate: Which One Should You Take?

Writer: Christian Svantesson
Christian Svantesson
Oct 7
3 min read

Zinc picolinate and zinc bisglycinate are the two forms most often sold as the best absorbed zinc. Both claims rest on real research. Both also rest on less research than the marketing suggests. For most people choosing between them, the form is not the deciding factor. The dose is, along with whether the label tells you what you are actually getting.



What the two forms are


Zinc cannot go into a capsule on its own. It has to be bound to something. In zinc picolinate, the zinc is bound to picolinic acid. In zinc bisglycinate, it is bound to two molecules of the amino acid glycine.


Zinc glycinate and zinc bisglycinate are the same compound under two names, for the same reason that magnesium glycinate and magnesium bisglycinate are the same thing.



What the absorption research actually shows


The case for picolinate comes mainly from one trial published in 1987. Fifteen volunteers took 50 mg of zinc a day for four weeks at a time, as picolinate, citrate, and gluconate in turn. Zinc levels in hair, urine, and red blood cells rose on picolinate. They did not change on citrate or gluconate.


The case for bisglycinate comes mainly from a trial published in 2007. Twelve women took a single 15 mg dose of zinc as bisglycinate and as gluconate. Bioavailability was 43 percent higher with bisglycinate.


Two things are worth noticing. Both studies are small. And neither one compared picolinate with bisglycinate. Each form beat zinc gluconate in its own trial, which is not the same as one beating the other.


For context, the US National Institutes of Health puts absorption from zinc citrate and zinc gluconate at around 61 percent in young adults, and from zinc oxide at 50 percent. The ordinary forms are absorbed reasonably well. The gap between a good form and an average one is real, but it is not dramatic.



The number on the front of the pack


This is where zinc labels mislead more often than on form.


A product sold as "zinc picolinate 50 mg" does not contain 50 mg of zinc. That figure is usually the weight of the whole compound. Zinc picolinate is roughly one fifth zinc by weight, so 50 mg of the compound delivers about 10 mg of zinc.


The figure to look for is elemental zinc per serving. Without it, two products cannot be compared.



Dose matters more than form


In the US, the recommended daily amount is 11 mg for men and 8 mg for women. In the EU, the reference intake printed on labels is 10 mg.


There is also a ceiling. The US upper level for adults is 40 mg a day. The EU upper level is lower, at 25 mg a day. Both figures cover zinc from food and supplements together.


Copper is the main reason for caution. According to the NIH, zinc doses of 50 mg or more, taken for weeks, can interfere with copper absorption and lead to low copper status. That is why some higher-dose zinc products include a small amount of copper.


So the practical order of questions is this. How much elemental zinc is in a serving? Is that amount right for the reason you are taking it? If the dose is high, is copper accounted for? The form comes after all three.



Two zinc products that passed the CuratedFit Standard


Osavi Zinc Picolinate provides 10 mg of elemental zinc per capsule, in a single form, at one capsule a day. The packaging shows "50 mg", which is the compound weight. Some retailer listings turn that into "500% NRV", which is wrong. The actual figure is 100 percent of the EU reference intake. This is a standard daily dose.


Varsons Zinc Bisglycinate 25mg with Copper provides 25 mg of elemental zinc and 1 mg of copper per tablet, with each amount stated separately. This is a higher-dose product. At 25 mg, it sits at the EU upper level before any zinc from food is counted. It makes sense for someone with a specific reason to take more, not as a default daily product.


Both share the same limitation. The stated amounts come from the manufacturers, and CuratedFit has not seen independent lab verification for either product.



The takeaway


Either form is a reasonable choice, and the research does not support ranking one clearly above the other. Check the elemental zinc figure first. Check the dose against what you actually need. If the dose is high, check for copper.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page